wadhwa law book publishers
Sign Up distric court india Login Tribunals Subscription Company Law Board About Us Law Ministry Contact Us Bills and ordinances Site Map Pariliament Help Cheap Website DEveloper Maneesh Mishra Nominal Index Article, march of law and reports Home Subscribe Madras Law Journal
wadhwa legal book sellers
Madras High Court Citation Online Legal Research Party Name National Law School Case Number Law Student Library Judgename Supreme Court Judgment Judgement Date High Court Judgment Actwise Madras Case Finder and Indian Legal Portal Full Text Indian Legal and Business Research Law Site Advanced Legal Internet Guide & Legal search engine
Search  in P. Ramanatha Aiyar - Advanaced Law Lexicon  
British and Colonial Law Reports and legal periodicalsMLJ ONLINE
 

© All Rights Reserved
O.P. Wadhwa
K.K. Wadhwa
V.K. Wadhwa
S.K. Wadhwa


Madras Law Journal, the first legal publication in India, that put Madras on the world map of judiciary through its ruthless objectivity and fearless reporting, had to sail through choppy waters in the court, particularly when the Madras High Court turned down the request for covering the proceedings of the High Court in 1892.

The
Comprehensive
Electronic Library.
Reporting Judgements of
Supreme Court
of India
and
Madras High Court
.
Case Laws with Equivalent Citations of Famous Law Journals such as All India Reporter (A.I.R.), Supreme Court Cases (SCC), Current Tamilnadu Cases (CTC), Company Cases (Comp Case), Income Tax Reporter (I.T.R.) providing judgment of Supreme Court of India as well High Court of and Allahabad , Allahabad Lucknow Bench, Andhra Pradesh, Bombay, Bombay at Goa, Chattisgarh, Delhi, Gauhati, Imphal, Jammu & Kashmir, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh Gwalior, MP Indore, Jabalpur, Orissa, Punjab & Haryana, Uttarakhand

Search english CasesEditorial Board
 
Editor In Chief
Justice S.S. Subramani
Former Judge,
Madras High Court.

Editor
K. Kannan
Advocate,
Madras High Court.

Hon. Advisory Editorial Board
R. Srinivasan
Advocate,
Madras High Court.

Arvind P. Datar
Sr. Advocate,
Madras High Court.

Reporters
V. Krishnaswamay
S. Shaymala
P. Valliappan.

The Oldest Legal Journal Of India



(1965) 2 MLJ 308 (Mad)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Present : Mr. Justice P.S. Kailasam

Case Number(s) : Criminal Revision Case No. 259 of 1964 (Criminal Revision Petition No. 254 of 1964).

Judgement Date : Monday 18th of January 1965

Chandra .......Appellant(s)
Versus
Accommodation Deputy Tahsildar, Office of the Accommodation Controller, Mount Road, Madras-2 .......Respondent(s)

Madras Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act (XVIII of 1960), sections 3 (1), (3), (5) and 33 — Power to requisition building under section 3(3) — Cannot be exercised before receipt of vacancy notice from landlord — Scope of section 3 (5) — Requisition under section 3 (3) before receipt of vacancy notice — Landlord failing to deliver possession — If guilty of contravention of section 3 (5) — Letters to Accommodation Controller to release building Jor personal occupation of landlord — Accommodation Controller failing to take action — Effect.

Under section 3 (1) of the Madras Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act the landlord is enjoined to give notice of vacancy within seven days after the building becomes vacant. The notice contemplated is to be given after the building becomes vacant and within seven days from, the date after the building becomes vacant. Section 3 (3) empowers the Government or the authorised officer to intimate to the landlord that the building is required for Governmental purposes within seven days of the receipt of the notice given by the landlord under section 3 (1). The exercise of power under sub-section (3) arises only after the receipt of notice under sub-section (1). Thus the power to requisition the house arises only after the receipt of the notice of vacancy from the landlord. Sub-section (5) ot section 3 — which provides that if the building is required for any of the purposes of section 3 (3), the landlord shall deliver possession of the building in good tenantable repairs and condition to the authorised officer or the allottee named by him — is not independent provision but is subject to sub -sections (1) and (3) of section 3 and any action under sub-section (5) can only be in furtherance of sub-section (3).






Oops. Login required for Full Text of Judgment.

You are not Logged in. Kindly Login.

If you are a new user then Register.


Online E-Books Designed & Programmed by Wadhwa Nagpur. Maneesh Mishra PHP MySQL Programmer, Web Developer

(Best view with 1024 X 768 Resolution)

© All rights including Copyrights and rights of translations etc. reserved and vested exclusively with O.P. Wadhwa, K.K. Wadhwa, V.K. Wadhwa and S.K. Wadhwa. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, or stored in any retrieval system of any nature without the written permission of the copyright owners.

By using this site, you (and any entity on whose behalf you are acting) are consenting to be bound by terms and conditions. See our Privacy Policy  &  Disclaimer