|
|
 |
(1961) 2 MLJ 5 (Mad)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Present : Mr. Justice Ramachandra Iyer and Mr. Justice Kunhamed Kutti
Case Number(s) : A.A.O. No. 320 of 1958. (30th Agrahayana, 1882, Saka)
Judgement Date :
Wednesday 21st of December 1960
| Arumugan Chettiar | .....Appellant(s) | | Versus | | | V. Kalyanasundaram Pillai and another | .....Respondent(s) |
Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 182 (2) — Applicability — “Where there has been an appeal” — Meaning of — Suit against two defendants — Decree passed against one only and suit against the other dismissed with costs — Appeal by plaintiff against decree awarding costs only — Dismissal — Execution against defendant who was
made liable — Starting point of limitation.
Cases Referred
Nagendra Nath Day v. Suresh Chandra Day L.R. 59 I.A. 283; I.L.R. 60 Cal. 1 (P.C.) : [1932] 63 M.L.J. 329
Satish Chandra Chaudhuri v. Girish Chandra Chakravarthy [1920] I.L.R. 47 Cal. 813.
Krishnama Chariar v. Mangammal [1902] I.L.R. 26 Mad. 91.
Kanniammal v. Balakrishna A I.R. 1935 Mad. 557.
Saraswathi Ammal v. Rajagopal Ammal I.L.R. [1952] Mad. 1 (F.B.) . : [1951] 2 M.L.J. 63
Bhawanipore Banking Corporation, Ltd. v. Gouri Shaukar Sharma [1950] S.C.J. 171; 1950 S.C.R. 25 .
Jacinto v. Fernandas A.I.R. 1939 Bom. 454.
Sivaramachari v. Anjenaya Chetty I.L.R. [1952] Mad. 277 (F.B.) : [1951] 2 M.L.J. 245
Oops. Login required for Full Text of Judgment.
You are not Logged in. Kindly Login.
If you are a new user then Register.
|
|
 |
|
 |
