|
|
 |

(2002) 2 MLJ 133 (Mad)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Present : K.Sampath, J.
Case Number(s) : C.R.P.No.2352 of 2001 and W.M.P.No.12528 of 2001
Judgement Date :
Wednesday 13th of March 2002
| Saraswathy, W/o.Pulavar R. Palanisamy and another | .....Appellant(s) | | Versus |  | | Viswanathan, S/o Muthusamy, Kumbakonam, Tanjore District | .....Respondent(s) |
Warning: strlen() expects parameter 1 to be string, array given in /home/mljlib/public_html/nominal-index/showjudgment.php on line 167
Warning: substr() expects parameter 1 to be string, array given in /home/mljlib/public_html/nominal-index/showjudgment.php on line 167
Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O.26, Rule 9 — Suit for bare injunction — Application for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner — Application dismissed — Revision against that order — No prejudice would be caused by appointing an Advocate Commissioner — The report of the Advocate Commissioner would help the Court in resolving the dispute — Revision allowed.
Cases Referred Kalpana v. L. Kaliannan [1998] 1 L.W. 85 R. Satyanarayana Rao v. M. K. Manoharan [2000] 3 L.W. 787 : [2000] 2 M.L.J. 382 Pillaiyar v. Ganesan : 1999 M.L.J. (Supp.) 432 Ponnusamy v. Salem Vaiyappamalai Jangamar Sangam A.I.R. 1986 Mad. 33 : [1985] 1 M.L.J. 380 Appulu v. Fatima Zohra 90 L.W. 369; 1982 T.L.N.J. 482 : [1982] 2 M.L.J. 340

Oops. Login required for Full Text of Judgment.
You are not Logged in. Kindly Login.
If you are a new user then Register.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |