|
|
 |
(2002) 2 MLJ 659 (Mad)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Present : A.Kulasekaran, J.
Case Number(s) : S.A.No. 1564 of 1990
Judgement Date :
Tuesday 18th of June 2002
| Ponnaiyan alias Ponnusami Gounder and others | .....Appellant(s) | | Versus | | | Karuppakkal alias Ponnayal and others | .....Respondent(s) |
Warning: strlen() expects parameter 1 to be string, array given in /home/mljlib/public_html/nominal-index/showjudgment.php on line 167
Warning: substr() expects parameter 1 to be string, array given in /home/mljlib/public_html/nominal-index/showjudgment.php on line 167
Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), Sec.100 — Suit for declaration and permanent injunction — Easementary right claimed over the suit cart track — Concurrent findings by Courts below in favour of plaintiff — Challenged in second appeal — Findings of the Courts below not based on legal evidence and suffer from legal infirmity — Case of the defendant materially prejudiced because of perverse finding — There is compelling circumstance to interfere with the concurrent findings of fact of the two lower Courts — Second appeal allowed.
Warning: strlen() expects parameter 1 to be string, array given in /home/mljlib/public_html/nominal-index/showjudgment.php on line 167
Warning: substr() expects parameter 1 to be string, array given in /home/mljlib/public_html/nominal-index/showjudgment.php on line 167
(B) Indian Easements Act (V of 1882), Sec.13 — Easementary right over suit cart track — Plea that there is no other alternative access — Accepted by lower Courts — The Commissioner’s plan’s report discloses existence of alternative cart track — Alternative cart track uneven, water logged and unfit for use — There cannot be a claim on the ground of easement of necessity when alternative pathway is available, though it is inconvenient.
Cases Referred
Murugesa Moopanar v. Sivagnana Mudaliar [1997] 1 C.T.C. 348
Ramaswamy Naicker v. M. Kandaswamy Gounder [2001] 3 L.W. 78
Lala Hem Chand v. Lala Pearey Lal A.I.R. 1942 P.C. 64
Jagdish Narain v. Nawab Said Ahmed Khan A.I.R. 1946 P.C. 59 : [1946] 2 M.L.J. 98
Nanjammal v. Marappa Gounder I.L.R. [1997] 3 Mad. 1425 : [1998] 1 M.L.J. 151
Mangayarkarasi v. Veerappan Ambalam 1998] 2 L.W. 147 : [1998] 2 M.L.J. 629
Sellappa Gounder v. Natesan [1998] 1 L.W. 654
K. Govindarajulu Chettiar v. V. N. Srinivasalu Naidu A.I.R. 1972 Mad. 307 : [1972] 1 M.L.J. 385
Ratanchand Chordia v. Kasim Khaleel A.I.R. 1964 Mad. 209 : [1964] 1 M.L.J. 293
Leela v. Ambujakshy A.I.R. 1989 Ker. 308
Rani Banerjee v. Smt. Malati Roy A.I.R. 1992 Cal. 302
Palani v. Perumal [1999] 1 L.W. 427
Ram Narain Arora v. Asha Rani [1999] 1 S.C.C. 141
Kondiba Dagadu Kadam v. Savitribai Sopan Gujar [1999] 2 C.T.C. 468 : [1999] 2 M.L.J. (S.C.) 105
Santosh Hazari v. Purushottam Tiwari (deceased) by L. Rs. [2001] 3 S.C.C. 179 : [2001] 2 M.L.J. (S.C.) 69
Guran Ditta v. T. Ram Ditta L.R. 55 I.A. 235; A.I.R. 1928 P.C. 172 : 55 M.L.J. 651
Krishnamaraza v. Marraju I.L.R. 28 Mad. 495 : 15 M.L.J. 255
Oops. Login required for Full Text of Judgment.
You are not Logged in. Kindly Login.
If you are a new user then Register.
|
|
 |
|
 |
