|
|
 |

(2002) 3 MLJ 26 (Mad)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Present : M.Karpagavinayagam, J.
Case Number(s) : S.A.No.713 of 2002 and C.M.P.No.5858 of 2002
Judgement Date :
Tuesday 11th of June 2002
| Sarojini | .....Appellant(s) | | Versus |  | | Muthu Navithan | .....Respondent(s) |
Warning: strlen() expects parameter 1 to be string, array given in /home/mljlib/public_html/nominal-index/showjudgment.php on line 167
Warning: substr() expects parameter 1 to be string, array given in /home/mljlib/public_html/nominal-index/showjudgment.php on line 167
Indian Evidence Act (I of 1872), Sec.73 — Comparison of signatures — Suit for recovery of money on a promissory note — Disputed signature compared with the admitted signature — Suit decreed — Appeal by the defendant dismissed — Second Appeal to the High Court — The Court is empowered to compare the disputed signature with the admitted signature — The comparison depends upon an analysis of the characteristics — Second Appeal dismissed.
Cases Referred Bomma Naicken v. Chinna Gounder [1998] 3 L.W. 407 O. Bharathan v. K. Sudhakaran A.I.R. 1996 S.C. 1140 Fakhruddin v. State of M. P. A.I.R. 1967 S.C. 1326 : 1967 M.L.J. (Crl.) 925 Muniswamy v. Pandiarajan [1993] 1 L.W. 186

Oops. Login required for Full Text of Judgment.
You are not Logged in. Kindly Login.
If you are a new user then Register.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |