(2002) 3 MLJ 125 (Mad)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Present : M.Karpagavinayagam, J.
Case Number(s) : C.M.A. No.132 of 1992
Judgement Date :
Friday 05th of July 2002
|Kaliammal (deceased) and others||.....Appellant(s)|
|S.Santha and others||.....Respondent(s)|
Warning: strlen() expects parameter 1 to be string, array given in /home/mljlib/public_html/nominal-index/showjudgment.php on line 167
Warning: substr() expects parameter 1 to be string, array given in /home/mljlib/public_html/nominal-index/showjudgment.php on line 167
Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), Sec.64, O.21, Rule 57(2) — Attachment — Money decree — Execution of — Property attached — Property closed due to stay by the appellate Court — Sale of property attached before petition was closed — Subsequent execution petition dismissed for default — Third execution petition filed — Whether sale is subject to the attachment since it was sold during the first order of attachment — Whether attachment continues — When the second execution petition was dismissed for default, the attachment ceased — Subsequent execution proceedings are not a contravention of the earlier execution proceedings — Property is no longer subject to attachment.
C. Venugopal Naidu (died) v. Krishnamurthy  2 C.T.C. 78
Athiappa Asari v. Chinna Gounder 93 L.W. 542
M. M. Lodha v. R. T. Patil A.I.R. 1974 Bom. 261
M. Marathachalam Pillai v. Padmavathi Ammal  2 S.C.W.R. 174
Oops. Login required for Full Text of Judgment.
You are not Logged in. Kindly Login.
If you are a new user then Register.